Gemma 3 27B vs Grok 4
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemma 3 27B by Google and Grok 4 by xAI are evenly matched across 4 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Grok 4 scores 1430 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemma 3 27B's 1339.
Context: In context, Grok 4 scores 256K on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 27B's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Gemma 3 27B generates output at 58 tok/s compared to Grok 4's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 390 ms for Gemma 3 27B versus 500 ms for Grok 4. Gemma 3 27B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing speed, Gemma 3 27B has the edge. For those who value general intelligence, Grok 4 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemma 3 27B vs Grok 4 — FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Grok 4?
Gemma 3 27B and Grok 4 are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.
How does Gemma 3 27B compare to Grok 4 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than Grok 4?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemma 3 27B or Grok 4?
Gemma 3 27B is faster, generating output at 58 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemma 3 27B vs Grok 4 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.