Serenities AI™

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Grok 4 by xAI wins on 11 of 17 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Grok 4 scores 1430 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 1375, while Grok 4 scores 87.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 84.0%.

Coding: In coding, Grok 4 scores 90.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%, while Grok 4 scores 72.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 55.0%, while Grok 4 scores 65.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 58.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1136 on Design Arena ELO compared to Grok 4's 1073, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1161 on Website Arena ELO compared to Grok 4's 1056.

Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Grok 4's 91.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Grok 4's 97.0%, while Grok 4 scores 93.0% on AIME 2025 compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 87.5%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, Grok 4 scores 87.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 81.0%, while Grok 4 scores 50.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.

Context: In context, Grok 4 scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 164K.

Pricing Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.50/1M input tokens and $2.1/1M output tokens, while Grok 4 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Grok 4's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 500 ms for Grok 4. Grok 4 delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and speed, Grok 4 is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4 — FAQ

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Grok 4?

Grok 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Grok 4 for coding?

Grok 4 is better for coding, scoring 72.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 55.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Grok 4?

Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.50/1M input and $2.1/1M output tokens. Grok 4 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Grok 4?

Grok 4 is faster, generating output at 55 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4 comparison cover?

This comparison covers 17 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.