Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 13 of 16 benchmarks against Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 1340, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 79.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.0% on IFEval compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 86.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 62.3%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.0%.
Math: In math, Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores 96.2% on MATH compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 93.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 95.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 95.0% on AIME 2025 compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 52.7%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 84.8%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 38.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output. Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 65 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Claude 3.7 Sonnet versus 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Claude 3.7 Sonnet delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing math and speed, Claude 3.7 Sonnet has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and affordability, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Gemini 3.1 Pro for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 62.3%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Yes, Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.