GPT-5.2 vs Llama 3.3 70B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.2 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Llama 3.3 70B by Meta, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.2 scores 1475 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 1210, while GPT-5.2 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.2 scores 95.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 72.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 22.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 26.0%.
Math: In math, GPT-5.2 scores 97.0% on MATH compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 60.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 99.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.2 scores 92.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 34.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 54.2% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 10.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.2 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input tokens and $14.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Llama 3.3 70B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
GPT-5.2 generates output at 90 tok/s compared to Llama 3.3 70B's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 380 ms for GPT-5.2 versus 300 ms for Llama 3.3 70B. Both models offer similar output speed.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, GPT-5.2 has the edge. For those who value affordability, Llama 3.3 70B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
GPT-5.2 vs Llama 3.3 70B — FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B?
GPT-5.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does GPT-5.2 compare to Llama 3.3 70B for coding?
GPT-5.2 is better for coding, scoring 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 22.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is GPT-5.2 cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B?
Yes, Llama 3.3 70B is cheaper. GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, GPT-5.2 or Llama 3.3 70B?
Both models generate output at the same speed of 90 tok/s.
What benchmarks does the GPT-5.2 vs Llama 3.3 70B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.