GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

GPT-5.2 by OpenAI wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against GPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.2 scores 1475 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 1120, while GPT-5.2 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 55.0%.

Coding: In coding, GPT-5.2 scores 95.0% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 65.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 18.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 22.0%.

Math: In math, GPT-5.2 scores 97.0% on MATH compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 55.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 99.0% on GSM8K compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 78.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.2 scores 92.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 28.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 54.2% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 10.0%.

Context: In context, GPT-4.1 Nano scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GPT-5.2's 400K.

Pricing Comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10/1M input tokens and $0.40/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output. GPT-4.1 Nano is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano generates output at 200 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 90 ms for GPT-4.1 Nano versus 380 ms for GPT-5.2. GPT-4.1 Nano delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, GPT-4.1 Nano has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.2 — FAQ

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does GPT-4.1 Nano compare to GPT-5.2 for coding?

GPT-5.2 is better for coding, scoring 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 18.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is GPT-4.1 Nano cheaper than GPT-5.2?

Yes, GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper. GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, GPT-4.1 Nano or GPT-5.2?

GPT-4.1 Nano is faster, generating output at 200 tok/s compared to 90 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.2 comparison cover?

This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.