Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.2 by OpenAI wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against Gemma 3 27B by Google, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.2 scores 1475 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemma 3 27B's 1339.
Context: In context, GPT-5.2 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 27B's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Gemma 3 27B generates output at 58 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 390 ms for Gemma 3 27B versus 380 ms for GPT-5.2. GPT-5.2 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GPT-5.2 leads across the board in general intelligence, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.2 — FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemma 3 27B compare to GPT-5.2 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than GPT-5.2?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 58 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.