Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Coder
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Qwen 3 Coder by Qwen, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 1290, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 72.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 90.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 66.5%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 52.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 76.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 48.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 28.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.20/1M input and $0.80/1M output. Qwen 3 Coder is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 350 ms for Qwen 3 Coder. Qwen 3 Coder delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 3 Coder is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Coder — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3 Coder?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Qwen 3 Coder for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 66.5%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder?
Yes, Qwen 3 Coder is cheaper. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 3 Coder costs $0.20/1M input and $0.80/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3 Coder?
Qwen 3 Coder is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Coder comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.