Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 72B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Qwen 2.5 72B by Qwen, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 1230, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 72.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 80.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 28.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 55.5%.
Math: In math, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on MATH compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 83.1%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 91.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 49.1%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 12.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen 2.5 72B costs $0.12/1M input and $0.39/1M output. Qwen 2.5 72B is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Qwen 2.5 72B's 80 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 350 ms for Qwen 2.5 72B. Qwen 2.5 72B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 3.1 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Qwen 2.5 72B is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 72B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 2.5 72B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Qwen 2.5 72B for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B?
Yes, Qwen 2.5 72B is cheaper. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens. Qwen 2.5 72B costs $0.12/1M input and $0.39/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 2.5 72B?
Qwen 2.5 72B is faster, generating output at 80 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 2.5 72B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.