Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Pixtral Large
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Pixtral Large by Mistral, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Pixtral Large's 1270, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to Pixtral Large's 70.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Pixtral Large's 80.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Pixtral Large's 35.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Pixtral Large's 40.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on MATH compared to Pixtral Large's 74.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to Pixtral Large's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Pixtral Large's 48.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to Pixtral Large's 22.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Pixtral Large's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, while Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output. Both models are priced identically for input tokens.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Pixtral Large's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 400 ms for Pixtral Large. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Pixtral Large — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Pixtral Large for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 35.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Pixtral Large?
Both models are priced the same at $2.0/1M input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro output costs $12.0/1M and Pixtral Large output costs $6.0/1M.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Pixtral Large?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Pixtral Large comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.