Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against Kimi K2.5 by Moonshot AI, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Kimi K2.5's 256K.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Kimi K2.5's 45 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 1210 ms for Kimi K2.5. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5 — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Kimi K2.5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Kimi K2.5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 45 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K2.5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.