Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 4 of 4 benchmarks against GLM-5 by Zhipu AI, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GLM-5's 1456.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GLM-5's 200K.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to GLM-5's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 1030 ms for GLM-5. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads across the board in general intelligence, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-5 — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (4 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to GLM-5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than GLM-5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.