Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 3 of 4 benchmarks against Gemma 3 27B by Google, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemma 3 27B's 1339.

Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 27B's 128K.

Speed Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Gemma 3 27B's 58 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 390 ms for Gemma 3 27B. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads across the board in general intelligence, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B — FAQ

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Gemma 3 27B for coding?

SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.

Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 58 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B comparison cover?

This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.