DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.2 by OpenAI wins on 12 of 14 benchmarks against DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek, which leads on 2. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.2 scores 1475 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 1340, while GPT-5.2 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 78.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.2 scores 95.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 84.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 46.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 48.0%.
Math: In math, GPT-5.2 scores 97.0% on MATH compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 82.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 99.0% on GSM8K compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 92.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.2 scores 92.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 55.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 54.2% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 35.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.2 scores 400K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek V3.1's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.14/1M input tokens and $0.28/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output. DeepSeek V3.1 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek V3.1 generates output at 65 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 450 ms for DeepSeek V3.1 versus 380 ms for GPT-5.2. GPT-5.2 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability, DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math and speed, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.2 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (12 vs 2). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek V3.1 compare to GPT-5.2 for coding?
GPT-5.2 is better for coding, scoring 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 46.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 cheaper than GPT-5.2?
Yes, DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.14/1M input and $0.28/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek V3.1 or GPT-5.2?
GPT-5.2 is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-5.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.