DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 11 of 16 benchmarks against o1 by OpenAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to o1's 1360, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to o1's 82.0%, while o1 scores 92.0% on IFEval compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to o1's 48.9%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to o1's 55.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to o1's 94.8%, while both score 97.5% on GSM8K, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 87.5% on AIME 2025 compared to o1's 74.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to o1's 77.3%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, o1 scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1000 ms for o1. DeepSeek R1 0528 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528 leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o1?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to o1 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 48.9%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than o1?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o1?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is faster, generating output at 40 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.