DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 13 of 16 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1501 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 1375, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.6% on MMLU-Pro compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 84.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 92.0% on IFEval compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 88.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 55.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 75.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 58.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 93.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 98.0% on GSM8K compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 97.5%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 95.0% on AIME 2025 compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 87.5%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 94.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 81.0%, while Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 77.1% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro's 65 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and speed, Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Gemini 3.1 Pro for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is better for coding, scoring 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 55.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.0/1M input and $12.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 16 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.