Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Large 25.12
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Mistral Large 25.12 by Mistral, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 1418, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 73.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 82.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 42.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 44.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 78.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 91.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 91.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 52.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 28.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output. Mistral Large 25.12 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Mistral Large 25.12's 70 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 380 ms for Mistral Large 25.12. Mistral Large 25.12 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Mistral Large 25.12 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Large 25.12 — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 25.12?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Mistral Large 25.12 for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 42.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Mistral Large 25.12?
Yes, Mistral Large 25.12 is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Mistral Large 25.12 costs $0.50/1M input and $1.5/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mistral Large 25.12?
Mistral Large 25.12 is faster, generating output at 70 tok/s compared to 68 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Large 25.12 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.