Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command R+
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Command R+ by Cohere, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command R+'s 1200, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command R+'s 62.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to Command R+'s 72.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command R+'s 20.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command R+'s 25.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Command R+'s 60.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Command R+'s 82.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 91.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command R+'s 35.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command R+'s 8.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Command R+'s 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Command R+ costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Command R+ is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Command R+'s 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 450 ms for Command R+. Claude Opus 4.6 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math and speed, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability, Command R+ is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command R+ — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Command R+?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Command R+ for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 20.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Command R+?
Yes, Command R+ is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Command R+ costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Command R+?
Claude Opus 4.6 is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command R+ comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.