Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

GPT-5.2 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Claude Haiku 4.5 by Anthropic, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.2 scores 1475 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 1220, while GPT-5.2 scores 83.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 65.0%.

Coding: In coding, GPT-5.2 scores 95.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 78.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 30.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 80.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 35.0%.

Math: In math, GPT-5.2 scores 97.0% on MATH compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 70.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 99.0% on GSM8K compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 88.0%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.2 scores 92.4% on GPQA Diamond compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 40.0%, while GPT-5.2 scores 54.2% on ARC-AGI compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 18.0%.

Context: In context, GPT-5.2 scores 400K on Context Length compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K.

Pricing Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input tokens and $5.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 generates output at 180 tok/s compared to GPT-5.2's 90 tok/s, and the time to first token is 120 ms for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus 380 ms for GPT-5.2. Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, GPT-5.2 is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.2 — FAQ

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to GPT-5.2 for coding?

GPT-5.2 is better for coding, scoring 80.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 30.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than GPT-5.2?

Yes, Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.0/1M input and $5.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.8/1M input and $14.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-5.2?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is faster, generating output at 180 tok/s compared to 90 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.2 comparison cover?

This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.