Grok 4 vs Ring Flash 2.0
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Grok 4 by xAI wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Ring Flash 2.0 by InclusionAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Grok 4 scores 256K on Context Length compared to Ring Flash 2.0's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Grok 4 generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Ring Flash 2.0's 83 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Grok 4 versus 1370 ms for Ring Flash 2.0. Ring Flash 2.0 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Ring Flash 2.0 leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Grok 4 vs Ring Flash 2.0 — FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4 or Ring Flash 2.0?
Grok 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Grok 4 compare to Ring Flash 2.0 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Grok 4 cheaper than Ring Flash 2.0?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Grok 4 or Ring Flash 2.0?
Ring Flash 2.0 is faster, generating output at 83 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Grok 4 vs Ring Flash 2.0 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.