Grok 4 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 Coder 480B by Qwen wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Grok 4 by xAI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Qwen 3 Coder 480B scores 262K on Context Length compared to Grok 4's 256K.
Speed Comparison
Grok 4 generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder 480B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Grok 4 versus 1530 ms for Qwen 3 Coder 480B. Qwen 3 Coder 480B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 Coder 480B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Grok 4 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B — FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4 or Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Qwen 3 Coder 480B wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Grok 4 compare to Qwen 3 Coder 480B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Grok 4 cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Grok 4 or Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Qwen 3 Coder 480B is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Grok 4 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.