GLM-4.6V vs Grok 4
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Grok 4 by xAI wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against GLM-4.6V by Zhipu AI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Grok 4 scores 256K on Context Length compared to GLM-4.6V's 128K.
Speed Comparison
GLM-4.6V generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Grok 4's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 770 ms for GLM-4.6V versus 500 ms for Grok 4. GLM-4.6V delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GLM-4.6V leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
GLM-4.6V vs Grok 4 — FAQ
Which is better, GLM-4.6V or Grok 4?
Grok 4 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does GLM-4.6V compare to Grok 4 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is GLM-4.6V cheaper than Grok 4?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, GLM-4.6V or Grok 4?
GLM-4.6V is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the GLM-4.6V vs Grok 4 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.