DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 9 of 15 benchmarks against Gemini 2.0 Flash by Google, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 1240, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 66.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.6%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 76.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 28.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 32.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 68.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 38.0%, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 220 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 85 ms for Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster, generating output at 220 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, IFEval, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.