Back to Articles
Guide

AI Coding Model API Pricing Compared: GLM-5 vs Claude vs GPT vs Gemini (2026)

Complete API pricing comparison for every frontier coding model in March 2026. GLM-5 at $1/$3.20, Claude Opus at $5/$25, GPT-5.4 at $2.50/$15, and more — with cost-per-task calculations.

Nishant LamichhaneUpdated 8 min read
Cover image for AI Coding Model API Pricing Compared: GLM-5 vs Claude vs GPT vs Gemini (2026)

Every Frontier Model's API Price, Side by Side

API pricing changes fast. This guide covers every major coding-capable model's pricing as of March 30, 2026, verified directly from official documentation and pricing pages.

The Master Pricing Table

All prices are per 1 million tokens (standard context, no caching or batch discounts):

ModelInput (per MTok)Output (per MTok)Context WindowLicense
DeepSeek V3.2$0.28$0.42164KMIT
Qwen 3.5 Flash$0.065$0.261MApache 2.0
Qwen 3.5 Plus~$0.26~$1.561MApache 2.0
Mistral Large 3$0.50$1.50262KApache 2.0
GLM-5$1.00$3.20200KMIT
GLM-5-Turbo$1.20$4.00200KProprietary (API)
GLM-5-Code$1.20$5.00200KProprietary (API)
Gemini 3.1 Pro$2.00$12.001MProprietary
GPT-5.4$2.50$15.001MProprietary
Claude Sonnet 4.6$3.00$15.001MProprietary
Claude Opus 4.6$5.00$25.001MProprietary

Sources: docs.z.ai (GLM), platform.claude.com (Claude), developers.openai.com (GPT), ai.google.dev (Gemini), api-docs.deepseek.com (DeepSeek), openrouter.ai (Qwen, Mistral).

What These Numbers Actually Mean

Raw per-token prices don't tell the full story. What matters is cost per task. A typical coding task involves:

  • Small task (fix a bug, write a function): ~2K input + ~1K output = 3K tokens
  • Medium task (build a component, refactor a file): ~10K input + ~5K output = 15K tokens
  • Large task (architect a feature, multi-file changes): ~50K input + ~20K output = 70K tokens

Cost Per Task Comparison

ModelSmall Task (~3K tok)Medium Task (~15K tok)Large Task (~70K tok)
DeepSeek V3.2$0.001$0.005$0.022
Qwen 3.5 Flash$0.0004$0.002$0.008
Mistral Large 3$0.003$0.013$0.055
GLM-5$0.005$0.024$0.114
Gemini 3.1 Pro$0.016$0.080$0.340
GPT-5.4$0.020$0.100$0.425
Claude Opus 4.6$0.035$0.175$0.750

Claude Opus 4.6 costs 34× more per large task than DeepSeek V3.2 and 7× more than GLM-5. That doesn't mean DeepSeek is better — it means you're paying for quality. The question is how much quality you need for each task.

Savings With Caching and Batch APIs

Every major provider offers ways to cut costs for high-volume use:

ProviderCache DiscountBatch API DiscountBest Combined Price (Input)
Claude Opus 4.690% on cache reads50%$0.25/MTok (batch + cache)
GPT-5.450% on cached input50%$0.625/MTok
Gemini 3.1 Pro90% on cache readsN/A$0.20/MTok (cache only)
DeepSeek V3.290% on cache hitsN/A$0.028/MTok
GLM-580% on cached inputN/A$0.20/MTok

With aggressive caching, Claude Opus drops from $5.00 to $0.25 per million input tokens — a 95% reduction. Gemini 3.1 Pro drops from $2.00 to $0.20. If you're building a product with repeated context (system prompts, codebase context), caching changes the economics dramatically.

Quality vs Cost: The SWE-bench Reality Check

Cheaper isn't always better. Here's how these models rank on SWE-bench Verified, the standard benchmark for real-world code editing:

ModelSWE-bench VerifiedOutput Cost/MTokCost-Efficiency Ratio
Claude Opus 4.6~80.8%$25.003.2% per dollar
Gemini 3.1 Pro78.8%$12.006.6% per dollar
GPT-5.478.2%$15.005.2% per dollar
GLM-577.8%$3.2024.3% per dollar
Qwen 3.576.4%$2.3432.6% per dollar
DeepSeek V3.272–74%$0.42173% per dollar

GLM-5 offers the best balance of quality and cost among frontier models — 77.8% SWE-bench at $3.20/MTok output is 7.8× more cost-efficient than Claude Opus. DeepSeek V3.2 is the absolute cheapest but trades off 8+ points of SWE-bench accuracy.

Subscription Plans vs Pay-as-You-Go

For developers who code daily, subscription plans often beat API pricing:

PlanMonthly CostBest ModelBreak-Even vs API
Claude Pro$20Opus 4.6~$0.80 of API usage/day
Claude Max 5×$100Opus 4.6~$3.30 of API usage/day
ChatGPT Plus$20GPT-5.4~$0.80 of API usage/day
GLM Coding Lite~$10GLM-5.1~$0.33 of API usage/day
GLM Coding Pro~$30GLM-5.1 + GLM-5~$1.00 of API usage/day

If you use your coding AI for more than 30 minutes a day, a subscription almost always beats pay-as-you-go pricing.

The BYOAI Strategy

If you're building apps on a platform that supports BYOAI (Bring Your Own AI), you can route different tasks to different models based on cost and complexity:

  • Boilerplate and simple edits: Qwen 3.5 Flash ($0.065/$0.26) or DeepSeek V3.2 ($0.28/$0.42)
  • Complex logic and architecture: Claude Opus 4.6 ($5/$25) or GPT-5.4 ($2.50/$15)
  • High-volume agentic tasks: GLM-5 ($1/$3.20) — best frontier-quality-per-dollar

Platforms like Serenities AI support BYOAI with no AI markup — you connect your own API key from any provider and pay only the provider's rates. Combined with batteries-included features (database, auth, storage, automation at $9–$24/month), you can run a full development stack without accumulating separate service subscriptions.

Hidden Costs to Watch

  • Long-context surcharges: GPT-5.4 doubles input pricing beyond 272K tokens and adds 1.5× on output. Gemini 3.1 Pro doubles input beyond 200K tokens. Claude removed its long-context premium on March 13, 2026 — the full 1M window is now at standard rates. Budget accordingly for large codebase ingestion.
  • Thinking tokens: Gemini 3.1 Pro's chain-of-thought reasoning generates internal tokens billed at output rates. A simple prompt can consume 3–5× more tokens than expected.
  • Rate limits: Cheap models may throttle under heavy load. DeepSeek V3.2 gives 5M free tokens on signup with no hard rate limit, but may slow responses during high-traffic periods.
  • Speed costs money: Claude Opus 4.6 Fast Mode costs 6× standard ($30/$150 per MTok). GPT-5.4 Pro costs 12× standard ($30/$180). Factor speed requirements into your budget.

Bottom Line

In March 2026, the pricing landscape for AI coding models spans a 100× range — from Qwen 3.5 Flash at $0.065 input to Claude Opus 4.6 Fast Mode at $30 input. The right choice depends on your task complexity, volume, and speed requirements.

For most developers, the sweet spot is a tiered approach: use a cheap model for routine tasks and escalate to a frontier model for hard problems. The GLM-5 family at $1/$3.20 occupies a unique position — frontier-level SWE-bench scores at mid-tier pricing — making it the strongest value proposition for developers who need quality without the Claude/GPT price tag.

Share this article

Related Articles

Ready to automate your workflows?

Start building AI-powered automations with Serenities AI today.