Llama 4 Scout vs o1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
o1 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 15 benchmarks against Llama 4 Scout by Meta, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, o1 scores 1360 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1240, while o1 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 4 Scout's 74.3%.
Coding: In coding, o1 scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Scout's 75.0%, while o1 scores 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 4 Scout's 28.0%, while o1 scores 55.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 4 Scout's 32.0%, while o1 scores 39.7 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 8.2.
Math: In math, o1 scores 94.8% on MATH compared to Llama 4 Scout's 68.0%, while o1 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Scout's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, o1 scores 77.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Scout's 38.0%, while o1 scores 32.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 4 Scout's 16.0%.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Scout scores 1.3M on Context Length compared to o1's 200K.
Pricing Comparison
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input tokens and $0.30/1M output tokens, while o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Llama 4 Scout generates output at 140 tok/s compared to o1's 35 tok/s, and the time to first token is 330 ms for Llama 4 Scout versus 1000 ms for o1. Llama 4 Scout delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Llama 4 Scout has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, o1 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Llama 4 Scout vs o1 — FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or o1?
o1 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Llama 4 Scout compare to o1 for coding?
o1 is better for coding, scoring 48.9% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than o1?
Yes, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens. o1 costs $15.0/1M input and $60.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Scout or o1?
Llama 4 Scout is faster, generating output at 140 tok/s compared to 35 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Llama 4 Scout vs o1 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.