Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba wins on 5 of 5 benchmarks against Grok 4 by xAI, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Coding: In coding, Qwen3.7 Plus scores 1258 on Design Arena ELO compared to Grok 4's 1073, while Qwen3.7 Plus scores 1281 on Website Arena ELO compared to Grok 4's 1056.
Context: In context, Qwen3.7 Plus scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Grok 4's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Grok 4 costs $3.0/1M input tokens and $15.0/1M output tokens, while Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32/1M input and $1.3/1M output. Qwen3.7 Plus is the more affordable option for API usage.
Verdict
Qwen3.7 Plus leads across the board in affordability, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus — FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus wins on more benchmarks overall (5 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Grok 4 compare to Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Grok 4 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Yes, Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. Grok 4 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens. Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32/1M input and $1.3/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Grok 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Grok 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison cover?
This comparison covers 5 benchmarks including Input Cost, Output Cost, Context Length, Design Arena ELO, Website Arena ELO. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.