Grok 4 vs K-EXAONE
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
K-EXAONE by LG AI Research wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Grok 4 by xAI, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, both score 256K on Context Length.
Speed Comparison
Grok 4 generates output at 55 tok/s compared to K-EXAONE's 62 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Grok 4 versus 320 ms for K-EXAONE. K-EXAONE delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
K-EXAONE leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Grok 4 vs K-EXAONE — FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4 or K-EXAONE?
K-EXAONE wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Grok 4 compare to K-EXAONE for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Grok 4 cheaper than K-EXAONE?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Grok 4 or K-EXAONE?
K-EXAONE is faster, generating output at 62 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Grok 4 vs K-EXAONE comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.