GPT-5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 by OpenAI wins on 10 of 15 benchmarks against Llama 4 Scout by Meta, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 scores 1464 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1240, while GPT-5.1 scores 86.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 4 Scout's 74.3%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 scores 93.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Scout's 75.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 4 Scout's 28.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 82.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 4 Scout's 32.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 49.4 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 8.2.
Math: In math, GPT-5.1 scores 95.0% on MATH compared to Llama 4 Scout's 68.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 98.5% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Scout's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 scores 88.1% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Scout's 38.0%, while GPT-5.1 scores 50.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 4 Scout's 16.0%.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Scout scores 1.3M on Context Length compared to GPT-5.1's 400K.
Pricing Comparison
GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
GPT-5.1 generates output at 95 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Scout's 140 tok/s, and the time to first token is 350 ms for GPT-5.1 versus 330 ms for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, GPT-5.1 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
GPT-5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout — FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.1 or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-5.1 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does GPT-5.1 compare to Llama 4 Scout for coding?
GPT-5.1 is better for coding, scoring 76.3% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is GPT-5.1 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Yes, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. GPT-5.1 costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, GPT-5.1 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is faster, generating output at 140 tok/s compared to 95 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the GPT-5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.