Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Next 80B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Qwen 3 Next 80B by Qwen, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Qwen 3 Next 80B's 262K.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Next 80B's 138 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 1070 ms for Qwen 3 Next 80B. Qwen 3 Next 80B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 Next 80B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Next 80B — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3 Next 80B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Qwen 3 Next 80B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Qwen 3 Next 80B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen 3 Next 80B?
Qwen 3 Next 80B is faster, generating output at 138 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen 3 Next 80B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.