Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Magistral Medium 1.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 3 of 3 benchmarks against Magistral Medium 1.2 by Mistral, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Magistral Medium 1.2's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Magistral Medium 1.2's 29 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 530 ms for Magistral Medium 1.2. Gemini 3.1 Pro delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Magistral Medium 1.2 — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Magistral Medium 1.2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Magistral Medium 1.2 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Magistral Medium 1.2?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Magistral Medium 1.2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 29 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.