Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.6V
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against GLM-4.6V by Zhipu AI, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to GLM-4.6V's 128K.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to GLM-4.6V's 68 tok/s, and the time to first token is 420 ms for Gemini 3.1 Pro versus 770 ms for GLM-4.6V. GLM-4.6V delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GLM-4.6V leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.6V — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6V?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to GLM-4.6V for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than GLM-4.6V?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM-4.6V comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.