Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google and Gemma 3 12B by Google are evenly matched across 2 benchmarks. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Context: In context, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131K.

Speed Comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro generates output at 65 tok/s compared to Gemma 3 12B's 90 tok/s. Gemma 3 12B delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

Gemma 3 12B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B — FAQ

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemma 3 12B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemma 3 12B are evenly matched across benchmarks. The best choice depends on your specific priorities such as coding ability, speed, or pricing.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro compare to Gemma 3 12B for coding?

SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro cheaper than Gemma 3 12B?

Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.

Which is faster, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemma 3 12B?

Gemma 3 12B is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 65 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B comparison cover?

This comparison covers 2 benchmarks including Output Speed, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.