Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 13 of 18 benchmarks against Llama 4 Scout by Meta, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1240, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Llama 4 Scout's 74.3%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 16.7 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 6.5.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Scout's 75.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 4 Scout's 28.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 4 Scout's 32.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 33.3 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 8.2.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Llama 4 Scout's 68.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Scout's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Scout's 38.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Llama 4 Scout's 16.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 3.5 on AA Agentic Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 0.5.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Scout scores 1.3M on Context Length compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 1.0M, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.8% on RULER compared to Llama 4 Scout's 80.2%.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro generates output at 55 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Scout's 140 tok/s, and the time to first token is 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus 330 ms for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 2.5 Pro has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (13 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 2.5 Pro compare to Llama 4 Scout for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Yes, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is faster, generating output at 140 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.