Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google wins on 16 of 21 benchmarks against Gemini 2.0 Flash by Google, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 1465 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 1240, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 66.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 9.3 on MT-Bench compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 8.9, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on IFEval compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.6%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.8% on TruthfulQA compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 80.5%.
Coding: In coding, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 89.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 76.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 28.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 32.0%.
Math: In math, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 88.0% on MATH compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 68.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.5% on GSM8K compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 84.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 38.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 48.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 18.0%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 94.5% on BBH compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 84.2%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 92.0% on Winogrande compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 89.5%.
Context: In context, both score 1.0M on Context Length, while Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 95.8% on RULER compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 85.5%.
Multimodal: In multimodal, Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 80.4% on MathVista compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 73.1%.
Pricing Comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input tokens and $0.40/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output. Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash generates output at 220 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 85 ms for Gemini 2.0 Flash versus 500 ms for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Gemini 2.0 Flash has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro — FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on more benchmarks overall (16 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Gemini 2.0 Flash compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is better for coding, scoring 63.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.3/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster, generating output at 220 tok/s compared to 55 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro comparison cover?
This comparison covers 21 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MT-Bench, IFEval, MATH, TruthfulQA, GPQA Diamond, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.