DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 VL 235B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 VL 235B by Qwen wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Qwen 3 VL 235B scores 262K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 VL 235B's 46 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1100 ms for Qwen 3 VL 235B. Qwen 3 VL 235B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 VL 235B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 VL 235B — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 VL 235B?
Qwen 3 VL 235B wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Qwen 3 VL 235B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen 3 VL 235B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 VL 235B?
Qwen 3 VL 235B is faster, generating output at 46 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 VL 235B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.