DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Qwen 3 Coder 480B by Qwen wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Qwen 3 Coder 480B scores 262K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Qwen 3 Coder 480B's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1530 ms for Qwen 3 Coder 480B. Qwen 3 Coder 480B delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Qwen 3 Coder 480B leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Qwen 3 Coder 480B wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Qwen 3 Coder 480B for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen 3 Coder 480B?
Qwen 3 Coder 480B is faster, generating output at 60 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen 3 Coder 480B comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.