DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against o3 Mini by OpenAI, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to o3 Mini's 1320, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to o3 Mini's 78.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to o3 Mini's 87.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to o3 Mini's 50.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to o3 Mini's 55.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to o3 Mini's 93.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to o3 Mini's 97.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to o3 Mini's 77.0%, while o3 Mini scores 45.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, o3 Mini scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while o3 Mini costs $1.1/1M input and $4.4/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to o3 Mini's 100 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 400 ms for o3 Mini. o3 Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value speed, o3 Mini is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o3 Mini?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to o3 Mini for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 50.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than o3 Mini?
Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. o3 Mini costs $1.1/1M input and $4.4/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o3 Mini?
o3 Mini is faster, generating output at 100 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o3 Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.