DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Magistral Medium 1.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against Magistral Medium 1.2 by Mistral, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 131K on Context Length compared to Magistral Medium 1.2's 128K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Magistral Medium 1.2's 29 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 530 ms for Magistral Medium 1.2. DeepSeek R1 0528 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528 leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Magistral Medium 1.2?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Magistral Medium 1.2 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Magistral Medium 1.2?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Magistral Medium 1.2?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is faster, generating output at 40 tok/s compared to 29 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Magistral Medium 1.2 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.