DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Kimi K2.5 by Moonshot AI wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Kimi K2.5 scores 256K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Kimi K2.5's 45 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1210 ms for Kimi K2.5. Kimi K2.5 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
Kimi K2.5 leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.5 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Kimi K2.5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Kimi K2.5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 is faster, generating output at 45 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Kimi K2.5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.