DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 3

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.

Grok 3 by xAI wins on 8 of 15 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Grok 3 scores 1402 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 1375, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Grok 3's 74.0%.

Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Grok 3's 82.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Grok 3's 42.0%, while Grok 3 scores 79.4% on LiveCodeBench compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 58.0%.

Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Grok 3's 82.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Grok 3's 93.0%, while Grok 3 scores 93.3% on AIME 2025 compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 87.5%.

Reasoning: In reasoning, Grok 3 scores 84.6% on GPQA Diamond compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 81.0%, while Grok 3 scores 28.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.

Context: In context, Grok 3 scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.

Pricing Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while Grok 3 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output. DeepSeek R1 0528 is the more affordable option for API usage.

Speed Comparison

DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to Grok 3's 65 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 400 ms for Grok 3. Grok 3 delivers faster throughput.

Verdict

For developers prioritizing coding and math and affordability, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value general intelligence and speed, Grok 3 is the stronger choice.

View Individual Model Pages

DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 3 — FAQ

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Grok 3?

Grok 3 wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.

How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to Grok 3 for coding?

DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 42.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.

Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than Grok 3?

Yes, DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. Grok 3 costs $3.0/1M input and $15.0/1M output tokens.

Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Grok 3?

Grok 3 is faster, generating output at 65 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.

What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 3 comparison cover?

This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.