DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 9 of 14 benchmarks against GPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI, which leads on 5. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 1120, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 55.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 65.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 18.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 22.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 55.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 78.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 28.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 10.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-4.1 Nano scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input tokens and $2.2/1M output tokens, while GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output. GPT-4.1 Nano is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 200 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 90 ms for GPT-4.1 Nano. GPT-4.1 Nano delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, GPT-4.1 Nano is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-4.1 Nano — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GPT-4.1 Nano?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (9 vs 5). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to GPT-4.1 Nano for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 18.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than GPT-4.1 Nano?
Yes, GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GPT-4.1 Nano?
GPT-4.1 Nano is faster, generating output at 200 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-4.1 Nano comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.