DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GLM-5 by Zhipu AI wins on 3 of 4 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GLM-5 scores 1456 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 1375.
Context: In context, GLM-5 scores 200K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to GLM-5's 55 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 1030 ms for GLM-5. GLM-5 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GLM-5 leads across the board in general intelligence, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-5 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GLM-5?
GLM-5 wins on more benchmarks overall (3 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to GLM-5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than GLM-5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GLM-5?
GLM-5 is faster, generating output at 55 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 4 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.