DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-4.6V
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GLM-4.6V by Zhipu AI wins on 2 of 3 benchmarks against DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek, which leads on 1. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 131K on Context Length compared to GLM-4.6V's 128K.
Speed Comparison
DeepSeek R1 0528 generates output at 40 tok/s compared to GLM-4.6V's 68 tok/s, and the time to first token is 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528 versus 770 ms for GLM-4.6V. GLM-4.6V delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GLM-4.6V leads across the board in speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-4.6V — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V wins on more benchmarks overall (2 vs 1). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to GLM-4.6V for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than GLM-4.6V?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GLM-4.6V?
GLM-4.6V is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM-4.6V comparison cover?
This comparison covers 3 benchmarks including Output Speed, Time to First Token, Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.