DeepSeek R1 0528 vs ERNIE 4.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 1 of 1 benchmarks against ERNIE 4.5 by Baidu, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 131K on Context Length compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128K.
Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528 and ERNIE 4.5 are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs ERNIE 4.5 — FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (1 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does DeepSeek R1 0528 compare to ERNIE 4.5 for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is DeepSeek R1 0528 cheaper than ERNIE 4.5?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, DeepSeek R1 0528 or ERNIE 4.5?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the DeepSeek R1 0528 vs ERNIE 4.5 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 1 benchmarks including Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.