Command R vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 10 of 14 benchmarks against Command R by Cohere, which leads on 4. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command R's 1130, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command R's 52.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command R's 62.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command R's 12.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command R's 18.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Command R's 45.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Command R's 72.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command R's 25.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 15.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command R's 5.0%.
Context: In context, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 131K on Context Length compared to Command R's 128K.
Pricing Comparison
Command R costs $0.15/1M input tokens and $0.60/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output. Command R is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command R generates output at 90 tok/s compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 300 ms for Command R versus 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528. Command R delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Command R has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command R vs DeepSeek R1 0528 — FAQ
Which is better, Command R or DeepSeek R1 0528?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 4). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command R compare to DeepSeek R1 0528 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 12.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command R cheaper than DeepSeek R1 0528?
Yes, Command R is cheaper. Command R costs $0.15/1M input and $0.60/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command R or DeepSeek R1 0528?
Command R is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command R vs DeepSeek R1 0528 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.