Command A vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 10 of 18 benchmarks against Llama 4 Scout by Meta, which leads on 8. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Llama 4 Scout's 1240, while Llama 4 Scout scores 74.3% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%, while Command A scores 13.9 on AA Intelligence Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 6.5.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Llama 4 Scout's 75.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Llama 4 Scout's 28.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Llama 4 Scout's 32.0%, while Command A scores 27.8 on AA Coding Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 8.2.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Llama 4 Scout's 68.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Llama 4 Scout's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Llama 4 Scout's 38.0%, while Llama 4 Scout scores 16.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%, while Command A scores 3.6 on AA Agentic Index compared to Llama 4 Scout's 0.5.
Context: In context, Llama 4 Scout scores 1.3M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K, while Llama 4 Scout scores 80.2% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output. Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Llama 4 Scout's 140 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 330 ms for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Llama 4 Scout — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (10 vs 8). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Llama 4 Scout for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Yes, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.10/1M input and $0.30/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is faster, generating output at 140 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Llama 4 Scout comparison cover?
This comparison covers 18 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.