Command A vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini by OpenAI wins on 14 of 14 benchmarks against Command A by Cohere, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 1310 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Command A's 1250, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 72.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Command A's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Command A's 78.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Command A's 32.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 65.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Command A's 35.0%.
Math: In math, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 78.0% on MATH compared to Command A's 72.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 92.0% on GSM8K compared to Command A's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 52.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Command A's 45.0%, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 35.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini scores 400K on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while GPT-5.1 Codex Mini costs $0.25/1M input and $2.0/1M output. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini's 170 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 180 ms for GPT-5.1 Codex Mini. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini leads across the board in coding, general intelligence, math, affordability, speed, making it the stronger overall choice in this comparison.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini wins on more benchmarks overall (14 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to GPT-5.1 Codex Mini for coding?
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 32.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
Yes, GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. GPT-5.1 Codex Mini costs $0.25/1M input and $2.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or GPT-5.1 Codex Mini?
GPT-5.1 Codex Mini is faster, generating output at 170 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs GPT-5.1 Codex Mini comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.