Command A vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Command A by Cohere wins on 8 of 15 benchmarks against Gemini 2.0 Flash by Google, which leads on 7. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from our benchmark data.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Command A scores 1250 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 1240, while Command A scores 68.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 66.0%.
Coding: In coding, Command A scores 78.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 76.0%, while Command A scores 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 28.0%, while Command A scores 35.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 32.0%.
Math: In math, Command A scores 72.0% on MATH compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 68.0%, while Command A scores 88.0% on GSM8K compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 86.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Command A scores 45.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 38.0%, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 18.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Command A's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 1.0M on Context Length compared to Command A's 256K, while Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 85.5% on RULER compared to Command A's 76.5%.
Pricing Comparison
Command A costs $2.5/1M input tokens and $10.0/1M output tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output. Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Command A generates output at 70 tok/s compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's 220 tok/s, and the time to first token is 400 ms for Command A versus 85 ms for Gemini 2.0 Flash. Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math, Command A has the edge. For those who value affordability and speed, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Command A vs Gemini 2.0 Flash — FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Command A wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 7). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Command A compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash for coding?
Command A is better for coding, scoring 32.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 28.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Command A cheaper than Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Yes, Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper. Command A costs $2.5/1M input and $10.0/1M output tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.10/1M input and $0.40/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Command A or Gemini 2.0 Flash?
Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster, generating output at 220 tok/s compared to 70 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Command A vs Gemini 2.0 Flash comparison cover?
This comparison covers 15 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, Output Speed, LiveCodeBench, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.