Codestral vs DeepSeek R1 0528
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek wins on 8 of 14 benchmarks against Codestral by Mistral, which leads on 6. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 1375 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Codestral's 1260, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 84.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Codestral's 68.0%.
Coding: In coding, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 88.0% on HumanEval+ compared to Codestral's 86.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Codestral's 40.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 58.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Codestral's 48.0%.
Math: In math, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 96.0% on MATH compared to Codestral's 72.0%, while DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 97.5% on GSM8K compared to Codestral's 88.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, DeepSeek R1 0528 scores 81.0% on GPQA Diamond compared to Codestral's 44.0%, while Codestral scores 24.0% on ARC-AGI compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 15.0%.
Context: In context, Codestral scores 262K on Context Length compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Codestral costs $0.30/1M input tokens and $0.90/1M output tokens, while DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output. Codestral is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Codestral generates output at 90 tok/s compared to DeepSeek R1 0528's 40 tok/s, and the time to first token is 280 ms for Codestral versus 900 ms for DeepSeek R1 0528. Codestral delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing affordability and speed, Codestral has the edge. For those who value coding and general intelligence and math, DeepSeek R1 0528 is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Codestral vs DeepSeek R1 0528 — FAQ
Which is better, Codestral or DeepSeek R1 0528?
DeepSeek R1 0528 wins on more benchmarks overall (8 vs 6). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Codestral compare to DeepSeek R1 0528 for coding?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is better for coding, scoring 55.0% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 40.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Codestral cheaper than DeepSeek R1 0528?
Yes, Codestral is cheaper. Codestral costs $0.30/1M input and $0.90/1M output tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0.55/1M input and $2.2/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Codestral or DeepSeek R1 0528?
Codestral is faster, generating output at 90 tok/s compared to 40 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Codestral vs DeepSeek R1 0528 comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.