Claude Opus 4.6 vs Pixtral Large
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 11 of 14 benchmarks against Pixtral Large by Mistral, which leads on 3. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
General Intelligence: In general intelligence, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 1496 on Chatbot Arena ELO compared to Pixtral Large's 1270, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 82.0% on MMLU-Pro compared to Pixtral Large's 70.0%.
Coding: In coding, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 93.5% on HumanEval+ compared to Pixtral Large's 80.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to Pixtral Large's 35.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 72.0% on LiveCodeBench compared to Pixtral Large's 40.0%.
Math: In math, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 92.0% on MATH compared to Pixtral Large's 74.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 97.0% on GSM8K compared to Pixtral Large's 90.0%.
Reasoning: In reasoning, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 91.3% on GPQA Diamond compared to Pixtral Large's 48.0%, while Claude Opus 4.6 scores 60.0% on ARC-AGI compared to Pixtral Large's 22.0%.
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Pixtral Large's 131K.
Pricing Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, while Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output. Pixtral Large is the more affordable option for API usage.
Speed Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 generates output at 68 tok/s compared to Pixtral Large's 60 tok/s, and the time to first token is 1680 ms for Claude Opus 4.6 versus 400 ms for Pixtral Large. Claude Opus 4.6 delivers faster throughput.
Verdict
For developers prioritizing coding and general intelligence and math and speed, Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge. For those who value affordability, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Pixtral Large — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (11 vs 3). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Pixtral Large for coding?
Claude Opus 4.6 is better for coding, scoring 80.8% on SWE-bench Verified compared to 35.0%. SWE-bench tests real-world software engineering by resolving actual GitHub issues.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Pixtral Large?
Yes, Pixtral Large is cheaper. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.0/1M input and $25.0/1M output tokens. Pixtral Large costs $2.0/1M input and $6.0/1M output tokens.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Pixtral Large?
Claude Opus 4.6 is faster, generating output at 68 tok/s compared to 60 tok/s. Faster output speed means shorter wait times for API responses.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Pixtral Large comparison cover?
This comparison covers 14 benchmarks including Chatbot Arena ELO, MMLU-Pro, HumanEval+, MATH, SWE-bench Verified, GPQA Diamond, Output Speed, Time to First Token, and more. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.