Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4 Reasoning Plus
Side-by-side benchmark comparison across coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing.
Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic wins on 1 of 1 benchmarks against Phi-4 Reasoning Plus by Microsoft, which leads on 0. This head-to-head comparison covers coding, math, reasoning, speed, and pricing metrics from the AI Value Index.
Category-by-Category Breakdown
Context: In context, Claude Opus 4.6 scores 200K on Context Length compared to Phi-4 Reasoning Plus's 32K.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.6 and Phi-4 Reasoning Plus are closely matched. The best choice depends on your specific use case and priorities.
View Individual Model Pages
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4 Reasoning Plus — FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Phi-4 Reasoning Plus?
Claude Opus 4.6 wins on more benchmarks overall (1 vs 0). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — each model excels in different areas.
How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Phi-4 Reasoning Plus for coding?
SWE-bench Verified data is not available for both models. Check the detailed comparison charts above for other coding-related metrics.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Phi-4 Reasoning Plus?
Complete pricing data is not available for both models. Check the pricing section of the comparison above for available cost information.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.6 or Phi-4 Reasoning Plus?
Output speed data is not available for both models. Check the speed section of the comparison above for available performance data.
What benchmarks does the Claude Opus 4.6 vs Phi-4 Reasoning Plus comparison cover?
This comparison covers 1 benchmarks including Context Length. Metrics span general intelligence, coding, math, reasoning, speed, and cost categories.